Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

love - marriage - committment
Attorney General Jerry Brown has submitted a referendum that would make California the first state in the nation to get entirely out of the marriage business. I have been hoping someone, somewhere, would be serious about taking this position!

If backers get enough signatures, any new marriages in the state would only get recognized as domestic-partnership contracts:
California same-sex “marriage” supporters are collecting signatures to support a ballot initiative that would remove civil marriage from California law entirely, as well as the provision codifying marriage as between a man and a woman.

The “Domestic Partnership Initiative” proposes to categorize all unions simply as “domestic partnerships,” while retaining all the rights of marriage for heterosexual couples, and extending them to homosexual couples. According to the initiative’s summary, “Legally speaking, ‘Marriage’ itself would become a social ceremony, recognized by only non-governmental institutions.”

State Attorney General Jerry Brown submitted the official title and summary for the measure on Monday, about one week after opening arguments in lawsuits challenging Proposition 8, California’s true marriage amendment.


Now THIS is something that deserves support. All of you people who have been pissed off about Prop 8, doing marches, calling people, etc - this is something that could be successful and might be worth a bit of your time and attention.

I hope this goes through in California and I hope it comes soon to a state each of us live in.

Comments

( 14 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]theophania wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 12:58 am (UTC)
Okay, but one thing worries me. They say that heterosexuals would have the same rights as marriage and homosexuals would get these rights but then they say that these unions won't be recognised by the government? That's not a good thing. I mean, if they're being performed by a civil authority and not a religious one, why shouldn't they be recognised? And what if a couple must leave the state in which they wre married? If the state they're going to doesn't recognise the marriage, they're in the same situation as homosexuals who get married now in states that allow it. And if these are civil marriages, religion shouldn't play a part in them anyway, no matter whose it is.
[info]mirthh wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 01:24 am (UTC)
No. If they are married only in a church, only have a regligous marriage, THAT is not recognized as leagal. They can have that. But if they want all the benefits of what is NOW considered legal, they have to ALSO have a 'domestic partnership' form. You can call yourself married, or you can say that you are in a domestic partnership. Or maybe you can say you are married AND legal. I expect that's the way it would go. And in fact, that would be what homosexuals want. To be legal. To be equal. This bill would put everyone legally equal. The religous nutters would have to butt out.
[info]theophania wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 01:36 am (UTC)
Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanations. Yeah, from what I've heard, even the domestic partnerships as they exist today don't give the same rights and benefits as marriages between heterosexuals. So this is a good thing indeed.
[info]snowcalla wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 02:35 pm (UTC)
No. They are saying that the government would recognise the Contracts and uphold them (the Domestic Partnerships) exactly the same for any two adults.

Marriage would be a social/religious event and would not be reconginzed or regulated by the State.
[info]mirthh wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 01:19 am (UTC)
This is great. Hope this one passes.
[info]brigidsblest wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 03:21 am (UTC)
I could get behind this. Neither of my marriages were at churches anyway; both of them were done by a JotP.
[info]ewigweibliche wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 03:47 am (UTC)
WHERE CAN I SIGN THAT PETITION??
[info]iamrobertsworry wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 03:53 am (UTC)
This will be great and it is what the people want.
[info]eoswildcat wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 04:45 am (UTC)
I like the potential here...
[info]camilov wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 05:28 am (UTC)
I've heard this suggested for a while, and advocate it myself. It's nice to see it get some visibility in the public sector.
[info]taipa wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 11:30 am (UTC)
Fantastic idea; name still sucks.
[info]eternalhearts wrote:
Mar. 13th, 2009 01:25 pm (UTC)
I've been a fan of this since 8th grade French class and learned that they and several other European countries do something similar.
[info]ursus_of_unrv wrote:
Mar. 22nd, 2009 01:51 am (UTC)
Yes, this is excellent.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2009 06:06 pm (UTC)
go to dompar.org. you can find the petition there
( 14 comments — Leave a comment )